| | Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) |  |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
dramamine
Posts : 88
Join date : 2012-02-21
|  Subject: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved)  Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:31 pm | |
| Bears send:
77 ovr WR Earl Bennett B pot 24 years old
4th round pick
Raiders send:
86 ovr FB Marcel Reece A pot 26 years old
Last edited by dramamine on Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:16 pm; edited 2 times in total | |
|
| | |
Ares
Posts : 692
Join date : 2011-11-10
Age : 32
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:48 pm | |
| dont see why the Raider's would send a 3rd round pick.
its an un-even trade, yes its JUST a fb, but raiders need more from the bears for this trade to get approved by me.
Denied | |
|
| | |
jerry31082
Posts : 976
Join date : 2010-12-29
Age : 42
Location : New York
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:57 pm | |
| agree with ares here. deny for now. | |
|
| | |
dramamine
Posts : 88
Join date : 2012-02-21
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:35 am | |
| | |
|
| | |
Greatest Of All Time
Posts : 143
Join date : 2011-11-03
Location : USSML TEAM- Seahawks
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:35 am | |
| | |
|
| | |
@BaileysBlitz
Posts : 733
Join date : 2011-08-22
Age : 39
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:16 am | |
| i think Bears should throw in at least a 4th....Wr's are used more than Fb but for his position Reece is still top 10 which is value...Bennett is a 3rd on the dc caliber WR | |
|
| | |
jerry31082
Posts : 976
Join date : 2010-12-29
Age : 42
Location : New York
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:30 pm | |
| I agree with Bailey. Bears still need to add a little more. | |
|
| | |
dramamine
Posts : 88
Join date : 2012-02-21
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:36 pm | |
| =/ Bennett has 88 catch, 82 rte, 90 cit, he's my starting WR and not really a slouch despite his overall, plus he's young and bound to progress.
If I absolutely must add a 4th, I'll do it only because my scheme has a lot of heavy sets and I need a FB. | |
|
| | |
cobbs87
Posts : 570
Join date : 2010-12-29
Location : New York
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:43 am | |
| We generally look at overall as the main factor in trades. I do think a 4th would even this out. A 4th is usually a C potential player at very best. | |
|
| | |
dramamine
Posts : 88
Join date : 2012-02-21
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:16 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
jerry31082
Posts : 976
Join date : 2010-12-29
Age : 42
Location : New York
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:23 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
@BaileysBlitz
Posts : 733
Join date : 2011-08-22
Age : 39
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:30 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
jerry31082
Posts : 976
Join date : 2010-12-29
Age : 42
Location : New York
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:10 am | |
| Trade committee we need another vote here. Ares, Sin and Cobbs..please vote on revised deal. Thanks. | |
|
| | |
cobbs87
Posts : 570
Join date : 2010-12-29
Location : New York
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:49 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Bears/Raiders Trade (Approved) | |
|
