Lions/49ers (Approved)

Posts : 570 Join date : 2010-12-29 Location : New York

Lions trade

HB Jahvid Best 85 ovr B pot. 24 yrs old, 623k

CB Alphonso Smith 79 ovr B pot. 26 yrs old 530k

for

TE Vernon Davis 98 ov, A pot, 28 yrs old, 4.9 mill

Posts : 376 Join date : 2011-01-03

49ers accept, welcome home Jahvid

Subject: Re: Lions/49ers (Approved) Wed Dec 21, 2011 11:57 pm

approved

Posts : 381 Join date : 2011-09-06

I dont like this i def think Vernon Davis is worth more..i will not cast a vote until i see where the other committee members feel on this 1.

Subject: Re: Lions/49ers (Approved) Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:28 am

approved
Jahvid is a top 10 back, smith is no slouch at CB, with the new restriction for TEs Davis is not as useful,

Subject: Re: Lions/49ers (Approved) Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:18 am

I believe Davis is worth more as well. Deny for now.

Admin Posts : 524 Join date : 2010-12-27

Denied

Posts : 376 Join date : 2011-01-03

seriously? Im a run heavy offense and getting a back I really want and a nice cb3 for a player that doesnt fit my system at all. I know hes elite, but I got exactly the players I wanted, we could add a token player or pick, but I dont need/want anything else

Posts : 570 Join date : 2010-12-29 Location : New York

If it's voted down, I'm fine with reworking it and respect the decision. Just as a technicality, who is on the trade committee these days? I thought Isaac was the final vote or are all trade committee members voting for both leagues?

Posts : 381 Join date : 2011-09-06

After strong cnsideration and maybe a lil begging lmao..i took schemes and style of play into mind and have decided to approve this trade.

Approved

Admin Posts : 524 Join date : 2010-12-27

Isacc, of course you can make any decison you want but it cant be based on schemes and style of play - it has to be yes or no.. players involved only. I don't care if it goes through I'm not trying to "cock block lol" a trade but I didnt think its enough for the premier TE in the game - thats all

Posts : 74 Join date : 2011-02-02

jahivd best is definitely a beast in a running team system who like fast backs. Thats the case with oko and i think with the corner added its close enough to warrant a ok between two owners who have been here. I approve

Posts : 381 Join date : 2011-09-06

KingJalen_d wrote:: Isacc, of course you can make any decison you want but it cant be based on schemes and style of play - it has to be yes or no.. players involved only. I don't care if it goes through I'm not trying to "cock block lol" a trade but I didnt think its enough for the premier TE in the game - thats all

So first you say i can make any decision i'd like then you say but i "cant" judge the trade on the criteria i see fit..ummm i beg to differ..besides the hittched deem regulations on "crystal balling" i will judge any trade on the criteria i see fit and best in OKO's system is worth VD, Hes the best TE yes but for OKO he might as well have been a 4th stringer cuz OKO doesnt utilize him passing wise..he was just another guy out there for OKO..so thats my opinion and my Vote and i stand by it.

Admin Posts : 524 Join date : 2010-12-27

nah.. I've bitten my tongue long enough.. Issac whats wrong with you? How in the fuckn world can a trade be viewed in your non objective position based on schemes and playing style? That has nothing to fuckn do with you - all you have to decide is whether YOU fuckn think there is equal value in the trade. So by you saying one person fits a style and thats why you approve a trade (thats a fuckn mute point and something you shouldn't even discuss) who cares.. All you should care about is the trade value ad make sure the league is operating fairly!!

Congrats on your trade guys, its never a problem - but this Issac guy shouldn't be voting on it anyhow cause according to threads he should be voting on ussmle only..

My initial post wasn't to come at you directly but this one is..

Posts : 74 Join date : 2011-02-02

if thats the case then i shouldnt be voting on here either just ussmle but at the same time none of this is that serious. Just saying

Admin Posts : 524 Join date : 2010-12-27

it shouldn't be that serious Rac - initially, I just tried to point out that subjective trade approval isnt the right way to go about it (in a friendly manner) but Issac pissed me off with his reply.. lol

and the point about ussmle was just to tell him to stfu - thats all lmao

Posts : 376 Join date : 2011-01-03

wow, relax fellas, its just a madden trade. Me and Cobbs are reliable owners, if I was brand new then I understand, but im not. Im a run heavy team and was the 1 seed and 11-2 before I lost Willis. And I think I would have won it all with Willis (Thats a shot at you Duke haha, lets get this heated up for year 2!)

Admin Posts : 524 Join date : 2010-12-27

oko. its not about u bro or cobbs believe me..

I'll leave it alone but Issac just not making any sense.. Will try to not say anything more.. lol

Subject: Re: Lions/49ers (Approved) Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:16 pm

Week 4 OKO, Week 4....

Posts : 381 Join date : 2011-09-06

LMAO guys got pissed ehh..for the record i took over in the trade committee for hittched..so i am on the trade committe in both lgs and am a co in only Evo..wont bother arguing with Jalen..u have ur opinion i have mines..just calm down bro seriously..remember its just a game and its just the internet..happy holidays every1!

» 49ers Rams (Approved)
» 49ers Titans (Approved)
» 49ers/Titans Trade (Approved)
» 49ers/Falcons Trade (Approved)
» Falcons-49ers Trade (approved)